Comments for Cisco Notepad

Comment on Configuration Change Notification & Logging by ncthanh

ncthanh — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:01:05 +0000

Hi Guy,

Could you show any option to know the time when the command execute.

Thanks.

Comment on Active FTP vs Passive FTP by having a problem with FTP through an Access list - TechExams.net IT Certification Forums

Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:34:58 +0000

[...] ACL as you would have to allow any to server for high ports. I found this, looks dangerous though. Active FTP vs Passive FTP Cisco Notepad ! Passive FTP permit tcp any host 150.1.4.1 eq ftp permit tcp any host 150.1.4.1 range 1023 [...]

Comment on Frame-Relay fragmentation to support realtime traffic by geekie

geekie — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:44:01 +0000

Hey man.
I work in IT too; a guy at my job just got his CCIE. I hope you did too, you’ve been inactive for a few months, I’m guessing you’re done studying or something.

Comment on Logging MAC addresses by eurekasse

eurekasse — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:17:42 +0000

is there a software for this or what else can i do?
thank you

Comment on Logging MAC addresses by eurekasse

eurekasse — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:16:03 +0000

i did all configuration mentioned above but couldn’t get mac addresses snmp traps. i use kiwi syslog and it receives some traps but i can’t read what mac addresses added or deleted. i mean messages are too complex. you can see it from the link:

http://img4.imageshack.us/my.php?image=47488292.jpg

when we write on cisco switch the command “show mac-address-table notification, it displays a “Operation: Added Vlan: 28 MAC Addr: 0060.7015.ac7a Dot1dBasePort: 24″ something like that and what i want is to see this notification in my Kiwi or another software you suggest that can receive traps readable way.

Comment on Multicast over Frame-Relay to have Spoke to Spoke communication by mukom777

mukom777 — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:38:37 +0000

After some more research …. I confirm, that pings to the group address from a spoke go succeed for a while then fail. If u wait a while, they succeed the fail .. in that cycle.

The failure occur when receivers switch from shared tree to source tree. I fixed this by ip pim spt-threshold infinity so receivers always remain on shared tree. Then the pings work consistently

Comment on Multicast over Frame-Relay to have Spoke to Spoke communication by mukom777

mukom777 — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:45:36 +0000

Something is curious here …. been cracking my brain on this … if u ping from R1, then what should be ur incoming interface on R2? … I think s0/0 but then s0/0 can’t be in both incoming interface and out too … which is where my problem lies.

Comment on Active FTP vs Passive FTP by Active and Passive FTP | BESIDA.net

Active and Passive FTP | BESIDA.net — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:23:14 +0000

[...] Source. [...]

Comment on Double NAT scenario to overcome overlapping subnets by ziila

ziila — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:48:11 +0000

Can you please explain me the flow of packet when you initiate the ping from R1 to 55.55.55.5.

Ok since the packet would be coming on Fa0/0 and the interface being configured as ip nat inside, so the source ip would be natted to 44.44.44.1 which i can see in the debug capture.

So now the SA:44.44.44.1 and DA: 55.55.55.5

This packet would now be routed through serial interface configured to be ip nat outside.

This where i do not understand how does the DA is natted to 10.0.0.5

My understanding is ip nat outside translate the source address.

So is there NAT configured on R5

Can you please explain this to me..

thanks in advance

Comment on Catalyst QoS – Per port, Per VLAN classification by dhblues

dhblues — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:38:33 +0000

Good Post. I like the way you verified the solution using accounting and qos monitor.